Correlation of Antibody Levels with Peripheral
Lymphocyte Subsets and Routine Hematological Parameters after
Vaccination with FMD Vaccine in Young Sires
1Department
of Animal Science, College of Life Sciences and Food Engineering,
Hebei University of Engineering, Handan 056021, China; 2Dairy
Cattle Research Center, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences,
Jinan 250100, China; 3Huayu Agricultural Science and Technology Co.,
Ltd., Handan 057153, China;4Hebei Station of livestock improvement,
Shijiazhuang 050011, China;
*Corresponding author:
msdljb@163.com
Abstract
High immune response (HIR) cows have balanced and
roborant host defences and lower disease, and selecting young sires is more
essential than selecting cows. Foot and mouth disease (FMD) is a communicable
disease in cattle, but there is no convenient method for selecting HIR young
sires to FMD. In this study, 39 young Holstein sires were vaccinated by a
trivalent FMD serotypes (A, O and Asia I) vaccine. Blood samples were obtained
from Jugular vein before vaccination and at day 51 after primary vaccination
(APV), and antibody levels of the three FMD serotypes, T-cell subsets and
routine hematological parameters were detected. HIR and low immune response
Holstein young sires were classed by the antibody levels of the three FMD
serotypes at day 51 APV. The relation of the antibody levels with the T-cell
subsets and routine hematological parameters were analyzed. The results showed
that the immune response capability were related to the amounts of CD3+CD4+
and CD3+CD8+ lymphocytes, and the CD4/CD8 ratio was
correlated to the antibody titers after vaccination. In conclusion, level of
platelet and mid cell count before vaccination, and CD4/CD8 ratio and level of
platelet after vaccination may be used to select the HIR young sires.
To Cite This Article:
YangL, HeK, LiJ, MaY, LiR, HouM, GaoY and Zhong J, 2019. Correlation of antibody levels with peripheral
lymphocyte subsets and routine hematological parameters after vaccination with
fmd vaccine inyoung sires. Pak Vet J, 39(2): 251-255.
http://dx.doi.org/10.29261/pakvetj/2019.045