Protection of Chickens against
Very Virulent Marek’s Disease Virus (MDV) by an Infectious Clone of
Meq-Null MDV Vaccination
Ning Cui1§, Yanpeng Li2§,
Shuai Su1*, Zhizhong Cui1,Jiabo
Ding3, Mengjiao Kang3, Peng Sun1
and Hongfei Zhu2
1College
of Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an,
Shandong, 271018, China; 2Biotechnology research
institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing,
100081, China; 3China Institute of Veterinary Drug
Control, Beijing, 100081, China *Corresponding author: ssu6307@163.com
Abstract
To evaluate the immune-protective effect of
GX0101Δmeq bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) which contains an infectious meq-null
Marek’s disease virus genome, 1-day-old SPF chickens were reared separately in
isolators with positive filtered air. On 1 day of age, chickens were immunized
with 20 μg of GX0101Δmeq BAC suspended in PBS, and challenge infection with 500
PFU very virulent rMd5 were performed at day 5 and 12 post-immunization
separately. During 90 days after challenge, all chickens were recorded and
checked for necropsy. The protective index of the two vaccines used was 80 and
40 for CVI988/Rispens and GX0101Δmeq BAC, respectively, after challenged with
the very virulent (vv) virus rMd5 at day 5 post-immunization. When challenged
with rMd5 at day 12 post-immunization, the protection index of GX0101Δmeq BAC
increased to 67%. Except that GX0101Δmeq BAC can confer protection
against vv MDV, a delay in the development of MD could be observed in some
chickens vaccinated with GX0101Δmeq BAC. On the other hand, compared with
CVI988/Rispens, the rescue of GX0101Δmeq BAC in the body is a prerequisite for
access to protection. Therefore, there is a blank period after immunization,
which provides a chance for infection with the wild MDV.