Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant and
Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing
Escherichia coli in
Chicken Meat from Eastern Turkey
Alper Baran1*, Mehmet Cemal Adigüzel2
and Mehmet Yüksel3
1Department
of Food Quality Control and Analysis, Erzurum Vocational School,
Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey
2Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary
Medicine, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey
3Department of Food Processing, Hınıs Vocational
School, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey
*Corresponding author:
alper.baran@atauni.edu.tr
Abstract
This study examined the antimicrobial resistance
of 105 Escherichia coli isolates from
broiler meat obtained from supermarkets in Erzurum, Turkey. Antimicrobial
resistance profile of the isolates was done as proposed by the Clinical &
Laboratory Standards Institute. Multiplex PCR was used for the presence of
extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) and determination of the phylogenetic
groups in the isolates. The results showed that resistance to penicillin was the
highest (97%), while resistance to carbapenems was not observed in any isolates.
A high percentage (94.29%) of multidrug-resistant isolates was observed.A total of 43 (52.14%) E. coli isolates was determined to be
positive for ESBL. ESBL-producing E. coli
isolates predominantly carried genes of the CTX-M class (28/43, 65.12%),
followed by the TEM (26/43, 60.47%) and SHV (1/43, 2.33%) classes. The
prevalence of CTX-M class isolates belonging to the CTX-M-1, CTX-M-9, CTX-M-2,
and CTX-M-8/25 groups was 41.86, 16.28, 9.3, and 9.3%, respectively. The
phylogenetic groups B1 (37.21%) and A0 (23.26%) were the most frequently
detected. These findings show that raw chicken meat sold in Erzurum is highly
contaminated with antibiotic-resistant E.
coli, including ESBL-producing E. coli,
which poses a serious risk for human health.
To Cite This Article: Baran A, Adigüzel MC and Yüksel M, 2020.
Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant and
extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing
Escherichia coli in chicken meat from Eastern Turkey. Pak Vet J,
40(3): 355-359. http://dx.doi.org/10.29261/pakvetj/2020.047